P.K.Ganeswar and 3 others vs The State Rep by the District Collector and 6 othe — 60/2015
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(b),27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI100000812015
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
21-05-2015
Registration No
60/2015
Registration Date
21-05-2015
Court
District Munsif Court, Palladam
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.K.Ganeswar and 3 others
Adv. Rangasami Krishnaveni
Respondent(s)
The State Rep by the District Collector and 6 othe
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Additional Written Statement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 08-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 02-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 23-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 13-03-2026 | Additional Written Statement |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed. The District Munsif, Palladam granted the petitioners' application to amend the plaint by deleting Item 4 (property of deceased plaintiff Palanisamy Gounder) from the suit schedule. The court found that while Palanisamy had been previously struck off as a party, his property was inadvertently omitted from deletion, and allowing the consequential amendment before trial commencement was justified in the interest of justice under Order VI Rule 17 CPC. No cost awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed. The District Munsif, Palladam granted the petitioners' application to amend the plaint by deleting Item 4 (property of deceased plaintiff Palanisamy Gounder) from the suit schedule. The court found that while Palanisamy had been previously struck off as a party, his property was inadvertently omitted from deletion, and allowing the consequential amendment before trial commencement was justified in the interest of justice under Order VI Rule 17 CPC. No cost awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts