Mariaymmal vs K.Deivasigamani Advocate - Arunkumar S — 12/2015
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 25(d). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI100000702015
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Date
13-01-2015
Registration No
12/2015
Registration Date
13-01-2015
Court
District Munsif Court, Palladam
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mariaymmal
Adv. Sureshkumar P P
Respondent(s)
K.Deivasigamani Advocate - Arunkumar S
N.Karuppusamy(Died)
K.Ananthi
Rajkumar
Nachammal
Jeevanantham
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Orders
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 04-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 18-02-2026 | Orders |
| 17-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 12-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The District Munsif Court at Palladam allowed the petition filed by M. Mariyammal under Order 7 Rule 14(3) and Section 151 CPC seeking to receive documents with condonation of delay in OS No. 12/2015. The court found the documents (written statement and appeal memorandum from earlier suit OS No. 188/2018) relevant to the present suit and noted that merely receiving them would not prejudice respondents. The court imposed costs of Rs. 1,000 payable to respondents and allowed the petition in the interest of justice to provide the petitioner an opportunity to present evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The District Munsif Court at Palladam allowed the petition filed by M. Mariyammal under Order 7 Rule 14(3) and Section 151 CPC seeking to receive documents with condonation of delay in OS No. 12/2015. The court found the documents (written statement and appeal memorandum from earlier suit OS No. 188/2018) relevant to the present suit and noted that merely receiving them would not prejudice respondents. The court imposed costs of Rs. 1,000 payable to respondents and allowed the petition in the interest of justice to provide the petitioner an opportunity to present evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts