Thangaraj and 5 others vs Aravintharaj and 2 others — 48/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI100000612020
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
Filing Number
74/2020
Filing Date
16-03-2020
Registration No
48/2020
Registration Date
16-03-2020
Court
District Munsif Court, Palladam
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thangaraj and 5 others
Adv. Chinnasamy A C
Respondent(s)
Aravintharaj and 2 others
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 11-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a cross-examination transcript from a civil property dispute case (A.V. No. 48/2020) in the District Civil Court, Palladam, dated 24.02.2026. The case concerns a dispute over a 42-foot-wide pathway (K.S. 847) and allegations of encroachment by the first defendant. The witness (Lakshmi) testified regarding property boundaries, a settlement deed from 2012, land measurements, and conflicting claims about the pathway width—with DTCP approval showing 32 feet versus the plaintiff's claim of 42 feet. The cross-examination was completed with no further re-examination, and the testimony was recorded and certified by the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a cross-examination transcript from a civil property dispute case (A.V. No. 48/2020) in the District Civil Court, Palladam, dated 24.02.2026. The case concerns a dispute over a 42-foot-wide pathway (K.S. 847) and allegations of encroachment by the first defendant. The witness (Lakshmi) testified regarding property boundaries, a settlement deed from 2012, land measurements, and conflicting claims about the pathway width—with DTCP approval showing 32 feet versus the plaintiff's claim of 42 feet. The cross-examination was completed with no further re-examination, and the testimony was recorded and certified by the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts