Selvaraj and another vs Muthusamy — 42/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Disposed: Contested--Decreed with cost on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI100000542021

Filing Number

81/2021

Filing Date

30-Mar-2021

Registration No

42/2021

Registration Date

30-Mar-2021

Court

District Munsif Court, Palladam

Judge

1-District Munsif

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed with cost

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Selvaraj and another

    Adv. Sriram J

  2. 2.Balasubramani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Muthusamy

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The District Civil Court of Palladam (Tamil Nadu) granted a permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendant from interfering with their peaceful possession and enjoyment of agricultural land. The court found that the defendant had no remaining rights to the disputed property after selling it completely to third parties through registered sale deeds, and therefore lacked authority to obstruct the plaintiffs' lawful possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  9. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  10. 24-Feb-2026

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  11. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  12. 12-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  13. 07-Feb-2026

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  14. 07-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  15. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  16. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  17. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  18. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  19. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  20. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  21. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  22. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  23. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  24. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  25. 05-Aug-2025

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  26. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  27. 17-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  28. 04-Jul-2025

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  29. 04-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  30. 03-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  31. 04-Apr-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  32. 10-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  33. 21-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  34. 04-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  35. 06-Jan-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  36. 07-Dec-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  37. 25-Nov-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  38. 18-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  39. 13-Sep-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  40. 22-Aug-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  41. 08-Aug-2024

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  42. 08-Aug-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  43. 23-Jul-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  44. 25-Jun-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  45. 05-Jun-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  46. 13-Mar-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  47. 05-Feb-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  48. 14-Dec-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  49. 10-Oct-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  50. 12-Sep-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  51. 18-Aug-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  52. 06-Jul-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  53. 15-Jun-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  54. 18-Apr-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  55. 29-Mar-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  56. 21-Feb-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  57. 20-Jan-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  58. 04-Jan-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  59. 05-Dec-2022

    Issues

    District Munsif

  60. 01-Nov-2022

    Issues

    District Munsif

  61. 26-Sep-2022

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  62. 04-Jul-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  63. 16-Jun-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  64. 06-Jun-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  65. 07-Apr-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  66. 24-Mar-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  67. 03-Mar-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  68. 24-Feb-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  69. 02-Feb-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  70. 20-Jan-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  71. 09-Dec-2021

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  72. 28-Oct-2021

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  73. 22-Oct-2021

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  74. 20-Oct-2021

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  75. 09-Sep-2021

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  76. 18-Aug-2021

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  77. 25-Jun-2021

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  78. 27-Apr-2021

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  79. 30-Mar-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  80. 30-Mar-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 42/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The District Civil Court of Palladam (Tamil Nadu) granted a permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendant from interfering with their peaceful possession and enjoyment of agricultural land. The court found that the defendant had no remaining rights to the disputed property after selling it completely to third parties through registered sale deeds, and therefore lacked authority to obstruct the plaintiffs' lawful possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case