Umamaheswari and another vs Thangathal and 4 others — 17/2021
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(d). Status: Issues. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI100000242021
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
33/2021
Filing Date
02-02-2021
Registration No
17/2021
Registration Date
05-02-2021
Court
District Munsif Court, Palladam
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Umamaheswari and another
Adv. Raveendran V
Mohanapriya
Respondent(s)
Thangathal and 4 others
Krishnmoorthy
Santhamani
Nandakumar
Vasanthamani
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Issues
Issues
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Issues | |
| 27-03-2026 | Issues | |
| 11-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a witness examination record from Civil Case No. 17/2021 before the District Civil Court, Palladam (Tiruppur district), not a final court order. The document records the examination-in-chief testimony of witness Uma Maheswari on October 16, 2025, regarding property-related matters including partition deeds and purchase deeds dated between 1956-2014. The witness's testimony and 13 documentary exhibits (marked as Exh. VA.SA.A.1 to VA.SA.A.13) were recorded, read back to the witness, and she affirmed their accuracy before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a witness examination record from Civil Case No. 17/2021 before the District Civil Court, Palladam (Tiruppur district), not a final court order. The document records the examination-in-chief testimony of witness Uma Maheswari on October 16, 2025, regarding property-related matters including partition deeds and purchase deeds dated between 1956-2014. The witness's testimony and 13 documentary exhibits (marked as Exh. VA.SA.A.1 to VA.SA.A.13) were recorded, read back to the witness, and she affirmed their accuracy before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts