Senniappan vs S.Karuppannan — 73/2016
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 25(d)of TNCF. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI100000052016
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
13-07-2016
Registration No
73/2016
Registration Date
13-07-2016
Court
District Munsif Court, Palladam
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Senniappan
Adv. Chinnasamy A C
Respondent(s)
S.Karuppannan
Palaniammal
Adv. Sathishkumar N
Shanthi
Adv. Sathishkumar N
Radha
Adv. Sathishkumar N
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Trial
Trial
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Trial | |
| 09-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 26-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 18-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 09-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Munsif Court, Palladam, partially allowed the petition filed by defendants seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner. The court appointed Advocate Commissioner J. Sarvabhauman (M.S. No. 3579/2011) with remuneration of Rs. 12,000 to inspect and measure only the suit cart track in S.F. No. 19/3B (5 cents allocation per the 1974 partition deed) with a surveyor's assistance, to determine the exact width available. The appointment was limited to the suit property; measurement of cart tracks in S.F. No. 16/4 and S.F. No. 19/2 (not subject matter of the suit) was rejected. The Commissioner must file a detailed report and plan by 07.09.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Munsif Court, Palladam, partially allowed the petition filed by defendants seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner. The court appointed Advocate Commissioner J. Sarvabhauman (M.S. No. 3579/2011) with remuneration of Rs. 12,000 to inspect and measure only the suit cart track in S.F. No. 19/3B (5 cents allocation per the 1974 partition deed) with a surveyor's assistance, to determine the exact width available. The appointment was limited to the suit property; measurement of cart tracks in S.F. No. 16/4 and S.F. No. 19/2 (not subject matter of the suit) was rejected. The Commissioner must file a detailed report and plan by 07.09.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts