Lakshmi vs The Tahsildar Advocate - Devi N — 309/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI070004452022
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
586/2022
Filing Date
26-09-2022
Registration No
309/2022
Registration Date
29-09-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruppur
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lakshmi
Adv. Kannan S
Maheswari
Respondent(s)
The Tahsildar Advocate - Devi N
The District Collector
Adv. Devi N
Rajeswari @ Raju
Adv. Podarasamy p
Gokulnath
Geethajothi
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 20-02-2026 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
This is a judgment from the Principal District Civil Court, Tiruppur (Original Case No. 309/2022) dated March 27, 2026, recording witness examination under Section 54 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The court examined witness Lakshmi (age 45, daughter of Krishnamurthy from Kangayakiri village, Tiruppur district) and recorded her cross-examination by the 3rd defendant's counsel, documenting her testimony regarding inheritance certificates, village administration records, and the legitimacy of certain documents submitted in the case. The witness's statement was recorded, read back to her, and she affirmed its accuracy before signing, but the document does not contain a final order or judgment on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a judgment from the Principal District Civil Court, Tiruppur (Original Case No. 309/2022) dated March 27, 2026, recording witness examination under Section 54 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The court examined witness Lakshmi (age 45, daughter of Krishnamurthy from Kangayakiri village, Tiruppur district) and recorded her cross-examination by the 3rd defendant's counsel, documenting her testimony regarding inheritance certificates, village administration records, and the legitimacy of certain documents submitted in the case. The witness's statement was recorded, read back to her, and she affirmed its accuracy before signing, but the document does not contain a final order or judgment on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts