M.Vignesh vs State board of school examinations rep by its secretary Advocate - Devi N — 297/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI070003862021
Next Hearing
18th March 2026
Filing Number
561/2021
Filing Date
29-11-2021
Registration No
297/2021
Registration Date
16-12-2021
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruppur
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.Vignesh
Adv. Alagarsaravanan P
Respondent(s)
State board of school examinations rep by its secretary Advocate - Devi N
The District Education officer
The Head Master
Adv. Devi N
The Director
Adv. Devi N
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 27-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 20-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 19-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 18-02-2026 | Judgement |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Original Case No. 297/2021 before the Principal District Civil Court, Tiruppur, the witness Vikram (age 20) testified on October 9, 2025, regarding a petition to change his date of birth from 14.09.2003. The court recorded his sworn statement confirming he filed the case and established his residence in Malaya Palayam, with supporting documents submitted. The court found it has jurisdiction to hear the matter, and the witness's testimony was transcribed, read back, confirmed as accurate, and signed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Original Case No. 297/2021 before the Principal District Civil Court, Tiruppur, the witness Vikram (age 20) testified on October 9, 2025, regarding a petition to change his date of birth from 14.09.2003. The court recorded his sworn statement confirming he filed the case and established his residence in Malaya Palayam, with supporting documents submitted. The court found it has jurisdiction to hear the matter, and the witness's testimony was transcribed, read back, confirmed as accurate, and signed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts