A. Jeyalakshmi vs Devi — 24/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 13-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI070003842024

Filing Number

476/2024

Filing Date

20-Dec-2024

Registration No

24/2025

Registration Date

21-Feb-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Tiruppur

Judge

17-Additional District Munsif

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A. Jeyalakshmi

    Adv. Sundararajan M

  2. 2.Thilagavathy

  3. 3.Minor Srivanth rep by his mother A.Jayalakshmi

  4. 4.Minor Gogul rep by his mother Jayalakshmi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Devi

  2. 2.Pushpa

  3. 3.The Commissioner Tiruppur Corporation Tiruppur

    Adv. Karthick B

  4. 4.The Tahsildar

    Adv. Gowtham M

Case History

  1. 13-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  3. 23-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary In Original Case No. 24/2025 before the Additional District Court of Tiruppur, the cross-examination of the witness (first defendant's side) was completed on 23-02-2026. The court rejected the witness's testimony regarding a video recording's authenticity due to lack of proper chain of custody and admissibility under evidence law. The cross-examination of the fourth defendant was also completed, and the witness statement was transcribed, read back, and signed by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Munsif

  8. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  9. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  10. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  11. 03-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  12. 03-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  13. 03-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  14. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  15. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  16. 23-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  17. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  18. 16-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  19. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  20. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  21. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  22. 07-Aug-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  23. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  24. 01-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  25. 19-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  26. 14-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Munsif

  27. 09-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Munsif

  28. 19-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Munsif

  29. 13-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Munsif

  30. 30-Apr-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Munsif

  31. 02-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif

  32. 19-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif

  33. 21-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 20-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 24/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In Original Case No. 24/2025 before the Additional District Court of Tiruppur, the cross-examination of the witness (first defendant's side) was completed on 23-02-2026. The court rejected the witness's testimony regarding a video recording's authenticity due to lack of proper chain of custody and admissibility under evidence law. The cross-examination of the fourth defendant was also completed, and the witness statement was transcribed, read back, and signed by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case