P. Jayachandran vs P.Muthulakshmi — 274/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI070003702021

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

23rd March 2026

Filing Number

540/2021

Filing Date

16-11-2021

Registration No

274/2021

Registration Date

22-11-2021

Court

District Munsif Court, Tiruppur

Judge

17-Additional District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

P. Jayachandran

Adv. Gunasekaran P

Respondent(s)

P.Muthulakshmi

The Superintendent Enginer

Adv. Gowtham M

The Divisional Engineer

Adv. Gowtham M

The Assistant Engineer

Adv. Gowtham M

The District Collector

Adv. Gowtham M

Hearing History

Judge: 17-Additional District Munsif

05-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

19-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

03-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

21-01-2026

Evidence

18-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

11-08-2025
Copy of Deposition

The Additional District Civil Court, Tiruppur recorded witness examination and cross-examination of defendants 2-5 in Original Case No. 274/2021 on 11-08-2025 concerning a property dispute over a 40-cent plot sold in 2017 and the right of way (25-foot pathway) provided to access it. The court documented the plaintiff's testimony regarding the disputed pathway, electricity connection through the contested route, and ownership boundaries, with the witness statement recorded and signed after being read back for confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District Civil Court, Tiruppur recorded witness examination and cross-examination of defendants 2-5 in Original Case No. 274/2021 on 11-08-2025 concerning a property dispute over a 40-cent plot sold in 2017 and the right of way (25-foot pathway) provided to access it. The court documented the plaintiff's testimony regarding the disputed pathway, electricity connection through the contested route, and ownership boundaries, with the witness statement recorded and signed after being read back for confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Tiruppur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case