R. Kalaiselvi and 4 others vs K.M. Murugesan Advocate - Muthushanmugasundaram V — 6/2014
Case under Rentrecoveryact Section 102i10and11-1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
RCOP - Rent Control Original Peition
CNR: TNTI070003552014
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
02-06-2014
Registration No
6/2014
Registration Date
02-06-2014
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruppur
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R. Kalaiselvi and 4 others
Adv. Dharmaraj S
Vijayalakshmi
Sakthi Karthika
Senthil Arumugam
Santhosh
Subramaniam(died)
Respondent(s)
K.M. Murugesan Advocate - Muthushanmugasundaram V
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 26-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary This is a rental dispute case (R.C.O.P. No. 6/2014) before the Principal District Court (Civil), Tiruppur, dated 14 February 2025. The document records the cross-examination testimony of witness Murugesan (the tenant/defendant) regarding disputed rental property details and ownership claims. The court examined his testimony on property boundaries, neighboring structures, rental payments, and alleged misconduct by the opposite party's representative, with the witness providing various denials and claims of lack of recollection regarding key facts in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary This is a rental dispute case (R.C.O.P. No. 6/2014) before the Principal District Court (Civil), Tiruppur, dated 14 February 2025. The document records the cross-examination testimony of witness Murugesan (the tenant/defendant) regarding disputed rental property details and ownership claims. The court examined his testimony on property boundaries, neighboring structures, rental payments, and alleged misconduct by the opposite party's representative, with the witness providing various denials and claims of lack of recollection regarding key facts in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts