Istaur Rahaman vs Abdul Bari — 188/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 23-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI070003072023

Filing Number

382/2023

Filing Date

31-Oct-2023

Registration No

188/2023

Registration Date

31-Oct-2023

Court

District Munsif Court, Tiruppur

Judge

17-Additional District Munsif

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Istaur Rahaman

    Adv. Muhil Bala P M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Abdul Bari

Case History

  1. 23-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  3. 20-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  4. 03-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  5. 20-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  7. 05-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  8. 24-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    The Additional District Civil Court in Tiruppur recorded the examination-in-chief statement of witness Asaan Ul Haq (son of Muhammad Tamees Uddin) on November 24, 2025, under Section 54 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness affirmed that the details in his affidavit are true and correct, and his statement was transcribed, read back to him, and signed after he confirmed its accuracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 24-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  10. 25-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  11. 25-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  12. 11-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  13. 12-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  14. 14-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  15. 07-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  16. 04-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  17. 04-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  18. 06-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  19. 14-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  20. 30-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  21. 08-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  22. 11-Dec-2024

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  23. 20-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  24. 05-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif

  25. 25-Oct-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  26. 16-Oct-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  27. 16-Oct-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  28. 17-Sep-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  29. 19-Aug-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  30. 01-Aug-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  31. 22-Jul-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  32. 15-Jun-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  33. 26-Mar-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  34. 27-Feb-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  35. 01-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    Additional District Munsif

  36. 02-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    Additional District Munsif

  37. 27-Nov-2023

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif

  38. 31-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 31-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 188/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District Civil Court in Tiruppur recorded the examination-in-chief statement of witness Asaan Ul Haq (son of Muhammad Tamees Uddin) on November 24, 2025, under Section 54 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness affirmed that the details in his affidavit are true and correct, and his statement was transcribed, read back to him, and signed after he confirmed its accuracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case