D.Ranjithkumar vs G.M.Irulappan Advocate - Sarguru V — 165/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI070002442022
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
328/2022
Filing Date
03-06-2022
Registration No
165/2022
Registration Date
03-06-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruppur
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
D.Ranjithkumar
Adv. Ramachandiran KRB
Somasundaram
Respondent(s)
G.M.Irulappan Advocate - Sarguru V
Palaniappan
Adv. Sarguru V
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Original Case No. 165/2022 before the Principal District Civil Court, Tiruppur, dated January 22, 2025, the court examined witness Ranganathan regarding a property dispute involving a 5,751 sq ft plot. The witness testified about a restraint order filed by the defendant preventing the plaintiff from entering the property, which is registered in the plaintiff's parents' names, and disputed claims regarding a temple on the reserved land. Cross-examination of the witness has been adjourned for continuation, pending further evidence and clarification on the temple's presence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Original Case No. 165/2022 before the Principal District Civil Court, Tiruppur, dated January 22, 2025, the court examined witness Ranganathan regarding a property dispute involving a 5,751 sq ft plot. The witness testified about a restraint order filed by the defendant preventing the plaintiff from entering the property, which is registered in the plaintiff's parents' names, and disputed claims regarding a temple on the reserved land. Cross-examination of the witness has been adjourned for continuation, pending further evidence and clarification on the temple's presence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts