Kathirvel vs Kumar Advocate - Habib Rahman J — 158/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI070002402022
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
324/2022
Filing Date
03-06-2022
Registration No
158/2022
Registration Date
03-06-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruppur
Judge
17-Additional District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kathirvel
Adv. Saravanakumar J
Kandasamy
Adv. Saravanakumar J
Respondent(s)
Kumar Advocate - Habib Rahman J
Gowri
Adv. Habib Rahman J
Parameswari
Adv. Habib Rahman J
Hearing History
Judge: 17-Additional District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 23-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 09-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 02-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
The Additional District Civil Court, Tiruppur recorded the first examination of witness Kumar (son of Ramasamy) on January 8, 2026 under Section 54(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness affirmed that all details in his affidavit are true and correct, and his signature on the document is genuine; the court ordered that marked documents be indexed and the matter was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional District Civil Court, Tiruppur recorded the first examination of witness Kumar (son of Ramasamy) on January 8, 2026 under Section 54(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness affirmed that all details in his affidavit are true and correct, and his signature on the document is genuine; the court ordered that marked documents be indexed and the matter was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts