T.Pandaram vs Srinivasan — 167/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: Lok Adalat. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI070002302022
Filing Number
311/2022
Filing Date
01-Jun-2022
Registration No
167/2022
Registration Date
03-Jun-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruppur
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.T.Pandaram
Adv. Sathiyamoorthi T
Respondent(s)
-
1.Srinivasan
Case History
-
06-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Mar-2026
Lok Adalat
Principal District Munsif
-
18-Feb-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
27-Jan-2026
Mediation
Principal District Munsif
-
02-Dec-2025
Mediation
Principal District Munsif
-
16-Oct-2025
Mediation
Principal District Munsif
-
11-Sep-2025
Mediation
Principal District Munsif
-
06-Aug-2025
Mediation
Principal District Munsif
-
11-Jul-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
04-Jul-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
12-Jun-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
06-Jun-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
18-Mar-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
14-Feb-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
07-Jan-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
18-Nov-2024
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
03-Oct-2024
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
02-Aug-2024
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
26-Jun-2024
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
22-Apr-2024
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
20-Mar-2024
Issues
Principal District Munsif
-
29-Feb-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
13-Feb-2024
Copy of OrderView PDF
The petition filed by the defendant (P. Srinivasan) under Order VII Rule 11(a) of the CPC seeking rejection of the plaint was dismissed without cost by the Principal District Munsif, Tiruppur on 13 February 2024. The court found that the plaintiff had pleaded a clear cause of action for the suit regarding possession of a property, and the defendant's allegations constituted defense matters to be raised through a written statement, not grounds for plaint rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Feb-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
31-Jan-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
27-Nov-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
04-Nov-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
20-Oct-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
07-Oct-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
15-Sep-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
04-Aug-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
14-Jul-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
01-Jul-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
14-Jun-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
10-Apr-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
10-Mar-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
06-Feb-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
16-Dec-2022
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
21-Nov-2022
For further Proceedings
Principal District Munsif
-
30-Sep-2022
For further Proceedings
Principal District Munsif
-
17-Aug-2022
For further Proceedings
Principal District Munsif
-
22-Jul-2022
For further Proceedings
Principal District Munsif
-
03-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 167/2022
The petition filed by the defendant (P. Srinivasan) under Order VII Rule 11(a) of the CPC seeking rejection of the plaint was dismissed without cost by the Principal District Munsif, Tiruppur on 13 February 2024. The court found that the plaintiff had pleaded a clear cause of action for the suit regarding possession of a property, and the defendant's allegations constituted defense matters to be raised through a written statement, not grounds for plaint rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts