C.R. Palanisamy vs R. Nataraj Advocate - Venkatachalapathi P — 205/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI070002132014
Next Hearing
16th March 2026
Filing Date
07-07-2014
Registration No
205/2014
Registration Date
07-07-2014
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruppur
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
C.R. Palanisamy
Adv. Sriram J
Respondent(s)
R. Nataraj Advocate - Venkatachalapathi P
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness examination record from the Principal District Civil Court, Tiruppur (Original Case No. 205/2014, dated February 9, 2026) in a property dispute. The witness Nadarajan testified under cross-examination regarding a jointly purchased property and 2-story building used for NSM Fabrics business, stating that both he and the plaintiff (his elder brother) jointly acquired the land, jointly constructed the building, jointly funded it with approximately 20 lakhs rupees, and jointly operated the business and repaid bank loans. The court recorded the witness's testimony, which was read back and confirmed by him before obtaining his signature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness examination record from the Principal District Civil Court, Tiruppur (Original Case No. 205/2014, dated February 9, 2026) in a property dispute. The witness Nadarajan testified under cross-examination regarding a jointly purchased property and 2-story building used for NSM Fabrics business, stating that both he and the plaintiff (his elder brother) jointly acquired the land, jointly constructed the building, jointly funded it with approximately 20 lakhs rupees, and jointly operated the business and repaid bank loans. The court recorded the witness's testimony, which was read back and confirmed by him before obtaining his signature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts