D.Subramaniam (Died) vs K.S.Raju Advocate - Chinnasamy A C — 177/2015
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order7Rule1CPC. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI070001932015
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
30-04-2015
Registration No
177/2015
Registration Date
30-04-2015
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruppur
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
D.Subramaniam (Died)
Adv. Giri N V
Rani
Adv. Giri N V
Nithiyananthan
Adv. Giri N V
Sobana
Adv. Giri N V
Respondent(s)
K.S.Raju Advocate - Chinnasamy A C
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
This is a civil property dispute order from the Principal District Civil Court, Tiruppur (Original Case No. 177/2015) dated January 8, 2025. The court recorded the testimony of witness Raju (age 64) under Section 54 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, regarding land ownership and boundary disputes involving 78 cents of land divided into two parcels (68 cents and 10 cents). The witness affirmed details about land boundaries, access paths, and ownership claims, with the court noting the testimony was read back and confirmed by the witness's signature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a civil property dispute order from the Principal District Civil Court, Tiruppur (Original Case No. 177/2015) dated January 8, 2025. The court recorded the testimony of witness Raju (age 64) under Section 54 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, regarding land ownership and boundary disputes involving 78 cents of land divided into two parcels (68 cents and 10 cents). The witness affirmed details about land boundaries, access paths, and ownership claims, with the court noting the testimony was read back and confirmed by the witness's signature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts