J.Palaniyammal and 2 others vs Dhanalakshmi and 13 others Advocate - Sathishkumar M — 143/2021
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI070001842021
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
277/2021
Filing Date
14-07-2021
Registration No
143/2021
Registration Date
28-07-2021
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruppur
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
J.Palaniyammal and 2 others
Adv. Naveen Lakshmanan D
Yuvasri
Kalidhass
Respondent(s)
Dhanalakshmi and 13 others Advocate - Sathishkumar M
Bhuvanasri
Adv. Sathishkumar M
Depakraj
Adv. Sathishkumar M
Minor.Priyanka
Adv. Sathishkumar M
Nagaraj
Adv. Balaji Thirumoorthy
Muthukumar
Adv. Subramaniam CP
Rukumani
Adv. Subramaniam CP
Sub Registrar Joint 1
The Tahsildar
Adv. Devi N
Village Administrative Officer Tiruppur
Adv. Devi N
The Assistant Electrical Engineer
The Commissioner Tiruppur Corporation Tiruppur
Adv. Karthick S
ICICI Bank Ltd Tiruppur
Adv. Karthick S
The District Collector
Adv. Devi N
The Sub Registrar
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Original Case No. 143/2021, Principal District Civil Court, Tiruppur Date: February 4, 2025 Outcome: The court recorded the plaintiff's affidavit testimony under Section 54(1969) on the first date of hearing and admitted 25 documentary exhibits into evidence. The case has been adjourned for cross-examination of the defendant's witnesses, with the court directing that the affidavit and documents be marked as the plaintiff's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Original Case No. 143/2021, Principal District Civil Court, Tiruppur Date: February 4, 2025 Outcome: The court recorded the plaintiff's affidavit testimony under Section 54(1969) on the first date of hearing and admitted 25 documentary exhibits into evidence. The case has been adjourned for cross-examination of the defendant's witnesses, with the court directing that the affidavit and documents be marked as the plaintiff's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts