Kairnisha vs R.N. Moorthy Advocate - Muralimohan S — 105/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(C). Status: IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI070001672025
Filing Number
235/2025
Filing Date
30-Jun-2025
Registration No
105/2025
Registration Date
21-Jul-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruppur
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kairnisha
Adv. Suresh S
Respondent(s)
-
1.R.N. Moorthy Advocate - Muralimohan S
-
2.Nishanth Kumar
Adv. Muralimohan S
-
3.Ramesh kumar
-
4.The Manager
Case History
-
22-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Apr-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
06-Apr-2026
For further Proceedings
Principal District Munsif
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary: The petition filed by SMFG India Credit Company Limited (4th defendant) under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC to set aside an ex parte order dated 06.10.2025 is allowed. The 4th defendant had failed to file vakalat on the hearing date due to a date confusion (noted 16.10.2026 instead of 06.10.2025), and the court found the non-appearance was neither willful nor wanton. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
23-Feb-2026
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
05-Feb-2026
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
29-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
27-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
18-Dec-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
04-Nov-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
06-Oct-2025
Issue of Service
Principal District Munsif
-
21-Aug-2025
Issue of Service
Principal District Munsif
-
21-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 105/2025
Summary: The petition filed by SMFG India Credit Company Limited (4th defendant) under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC to set aside an ex parte order dated 06.10.2025 is allowed. The 4th defendant had failed to file vakalat on the hearing date due to a date confusion (noted 16.10.2026 instead of 06.10.2025), and the court found the non-appearance was neither willful nor wanton. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts