N. Nandhakumar vs R.N. Moorthy Advocate - Muralimohan S — 107/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(C). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI070001662025
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
234/2025
Filing Date
30-06-2025
Registration No
107/2025
Registration Date
21-07-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruppur
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
N. Nandhakumar
Adv. Suresh S
Respondent(s)
R.N. Moorthy Advocate - Muralimohan S
Nishanth kumar
Adv. Muralimohan S
Ramesh kumar
The Manager
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
For further Proceedings
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 06-04-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 09-03-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 23-02-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 05-02-2026 | Written Statement |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by SMFG India Credit Company Limited (4th defendant) under Order 9 Rule 7 of CPC to set aside an ex parte order dated 06.10.2025 has been allowed. The 4th defendant had missed the hearing date due to noting the wrong date (16.10.2026 instead of 06.10.2025) and could not file the vakalat, resulting in an ex parte order. The court found the non-appearance was not willful and granted the petition to ensure the defendant gets an opportunity to prove its case. No costs have been awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by SMFG India Credit Company Limited (4th defendant) under Order 9 Rule 7 of CPC to set aside an ex parte order dated 06.10.2025 has been allowed. The 4th defendant had missed the hearing date due to noting the wrong date (16.10.2026 instead of 06.10.2025) and could not file the vakalat, resulting in an ex parte order. The court found the non-appearance was not willful and granted the petition to ensure the defendant gets an opportunity to prove its case. No costs have been awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts