D. Jayanthi vs R.N. Moorthy Advocate - Muralimohan S — 103/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(C). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI070001642025
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
232/2025
Filing Date
30-06-2025
Registration No
103/2025
Registration Date
21-07-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruppur
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
D. Jayanthi
Adv. Suresh S
Respondent(s)
R.N. Moorthy Advocate - Muralimohan S
Nishanth Kumar
Adv. Muralimohan S
Rameshkumar
The Manager
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 06-04-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 09-03-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 23-02-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 05-02-2026 | Written Statement |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by SMFG India Credit Company Limited (4th defendant) under Order 9 Rule 7 of CPC to set aside the ex parte order dated 06.10.2025 is allowed. The court found that the defendant's failure to file vakalat was due to a date notation error (16.10.2026 instead of 06.10.2025) rather than willful negligence, and granted the defendant an opportunity to present its case. No costs are awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by SMFG India Credit Company Limited (4th defendant) under Order 9 Rule 7 of CPC to set aside the ex parte order dated 06.10.2025 is allowed. The court found that the defendant's failure to file vakalat was due to a date notation error (16.10.2026 instead of 06.10.2025) rather than willful negligence, and granted the defendant an opportunity to present its case. No costs are awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts