D. Jayanthi vs R.N. Moorthy Advocate - Muralimohan S — 103/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(C). Status: IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending Next hearing 22-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI070001642025

Filing Number

232/2025

Filing Date

30-Jun-2025

Registration No

103/2025

Registration Date

21-Jul-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Tiruppur

Judge

6-Principal District Munsif

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.D. Jayanthi

    Adv. Suresh S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R.N. Moorthy Advocate - Muralimohan S

  2. 2.Nishanth Kumar

    Adv. Muralimohan S

  3. 3.Rameshkumar

  4. 4.The Manager

Case History

  1. 22-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Munsif

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The petition filed by SMFG India Credit Company Limited (4th defendant) under Order 9 Rule 7 of CPC to set aside the ex parte order dated 06.10.2025 is allowed. The court found that the defendant's failure to file vakalat was due to a date notation error (16.10.2026 instead of 06.10.2025) rather than willful negligence, and granted the defendant an opportunity to present its case. No costs are awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  11. 04-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  12. 06-Oct-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Munsif

  13. 21-Aug-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Munsif

  14. 21-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 30-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 103/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by SMFG India Credit Company Limited (4th defendant) under Order 9 Rule 7 of CPC to set aside the ex parte order dated 06.10.2025 is allowed. The court found that the defendant's failure to file vakalat was due to a date notation error (16.10.2026 instead of 06.10.2025) rather than willful negligence, and granted the defendant an opportunity to present its case. No costs are awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case