A.Paramanadham vs Rev Stepan Jayaraj — 63/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI070000902022
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
127/2022
Filing Date
02-03-2022
Registration No
63/2022
Registration Date
02-03-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruppur
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A.Paramanadham
Adv. Sabarigeethan S
Respondent(s)
Rev Stepan Jayaraj
The Tamil Nadu District Counsil of South India Assembly God Rev T.S.Rajasekar
The Tamilnadu District Counsel of South India Assembly God rep by its SecretaRev.J.Stanly Manikaraj
The Tamilnadu District Counsil of South India Assembly God rep by itsTreasurer Rev.P.Antony Rajan
The Tamil Nadu District Counsil of South India Assembly God rep by its Committe Member Christodoss
David Periyadurai
Andavar Selvam
Jebamani
German Raj
Arivukannan
Anbarasan
Panneer
David Selvakumar
Anand Allexander
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a civil case (O.S. No. 63/2022) from the Principal District Court, Tiruppur, dated November 12, 2025, involving a dispute regarding church administration and the appointment of a priest. The witness (plaintiff Paramanandham, 62 years old) testified and was cross-examined by defendants 7-12, addressing questions about the AG Church's governance structure, his role as priest for 30 years, and the appointment of defendant 14 without his consent. The court recorded the witness's testimony, which was transcribed, read back to him, and signed by him after he confirmed its accuracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a civil case (O.S. No. 63/2022) from the Principal District Court, Tiruppur, dated November 12, 2025, involving a dispute regarding church administration and the appointment of a priest. The witness (plaintiff Paramanandham, 62 years old) testified and was cross-examined by defendants 7-12, addressing questions about the AG Church's governance structure, his role as priest for 30 years, and the appointment of defendant 14 without his consent. The court recorded the witness's testimony, which was transcribed, read back to him, and signed by him after he confirmed its accuracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts