Thangamani and 1other vs Sarasu and 1 other — 56/2016
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 37-225-c. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI070000812016
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
16-02-2016
Registration No
56/2016
Registration Date
16-02-2016
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruppur
Judge
17-Additional District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thangamani and 1other
Adv. Anandan V
Respondent(s)
Sarasu and 1 other
Manjula
Sumathi
Mallika
Hearing History
Judge: 17-Additional District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Evidence
Orders
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 06-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 12-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: IA 169/2026 in OS 56/2016, Additional District Court, Tiruppur Outcome: The petition (IA 169/2026) filed by plaintiffs Rasu and Ravanan seeking permission to file an additional counter-claim has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioners failed to provide adequate reasons or supporting documents for filing the additional counter-claim and concluded the petition was filed with the intent to delay the main case proceedings. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: IA 169/2026 in OS 56/2016, Additional District Court, Tiruppur Outcome: The petition (IA 169/2026) filed by plaintiffs Rasu and Ravanan seeking permission to file an additional counter-claim has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioners failed to provide adequate reasons or supporting documents for filing the additional counter-claim and concluded the petition was filed with the intent to delay the main case proceedings. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts