G.Narayanamoorthy vs P.Thirumoorthy Advocate - Amarnath A — 47/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI070000652023
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
87/2023
Filing Date
27-02-2023
Registration No
47/2023
Registration Date
27-02-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruppur
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
G.Narayanamoorthy
Adv. Subash Chandra Bose A
Poongodi
Respondent(s)
P.Thirumoorthy Advocate - Amarnath A
Manivannan
Adv. Raju V
Mathiyalagan
Adv. Raju V
Subbathal
Adv. Raju V
Jeganathan
Adv. Raju V
Velusamy
Adv. Raju V
Samiyappan
Mynavathi
Adv. Raju V
Gopal A
Adv. Raju V
Sivakumar (amended as per order in IA 771/23 dt 5.10.
Tamilselvan (amended as per order in IA 771/23 dt 5.10.
Manian
Adv. Raju V
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Court: Principal District Civil Court, Tiruppur Case: O.S. No. 47/2023 Date: April 2, 2026 Outcome: The witness was examined and cross-examined on property rights and succession matters related to land inheritance dating back to 1932. The court recorded the witness's testimony regarding the defendant's claims to property rights as heirs of Kaliyappa Kaunder, and their position that rights granted in 1932 cannot be subsequently altered. The examination has been completed and the case proceedings continue before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court: Principal District Civil Court, Tiruppur Case: O.S. No. 47/2023 Date: April 2, 2026 Outcome: The witness was examined and cross-examined on property rights and succession matters related to land inheritance dating back to 1932. The court recorded the witness's testimony regarding the defendant's claims to property rights as heirs of Kaliyappa Kaunder, and their position that rights granted in 1932 cannot be subsequently altered. The examination has been completed and the case proceedings continue before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts