Senthilkumar vs G.Kumaresan Advocate - Nirmala K — 458/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 42(a),22. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI040018572023
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
Filing Number
1134/2023
Filing Date
17-10-2023
Registration No
458/2023
Registration Date
06-11-2023
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
5-Additional Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Senthilkumar
Adv. Arumugam A
Respondent(s)
G.Kumaresan Advocate - Nirmala K
N.Rathinasamy
Adv. Nirmala K
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional Subordinate Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary Case: OS.No. 458/2023, Additional District Court, Tiruppur Date: 17.02.2026 The court proceeded with cross-examination of witness D.W-2 (Mr. Baskaran) in a suit involving allegations of fraudulent money-lending (lottery/chit scheme). The witness testified regarding documents, photographs, and transactions between the first and second defendants, affirming knowledge of certain property transfer documents dated 14.10.2009. The court recorded the witness's statements after administering oath, and objections raised by the first defendant's counsel regarding document presentation were noted for consideration in the final judgment. The case continues with examination of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Case: OS.No. 458/2023, Additional District Court, Tiruppur Date: 17.02.2026 The court proceeded with cross-examination of witness D.W-2 (Mr. Baskaran) in a suit involving allegations of fraudulent money-lending (lottery/chit scheme). The witness testified regarding documents, photographs, and transactions between the first and second defendants, affirming knowledge of certain property transfer documents dated 14.10.2009. The court recorded the witness's statements after administering oath, and objections raised by the first defendant's counsel regarding document presentation were noted for consideration in the final judgment. The case continues with examination of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts