Inspector Of Police ,Central Police Station ,Tiruppur vs Muthu @ Muthukumar (Split up) — 246/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,307r/w,149. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNTI040016502023
Filing Number
637/2023
Filing Date
02-Sep-2023
Registration No
246/2023
Registration Date
02-Sep-2023
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
4-Principal Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
2404
Police Station
Tirupur Central Police Station
Year
2010
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector Of Police ,Central Police Station ,Tiruppur
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Muthu @ Muthukumar (Split up)
-
2.Durai
-
3.Manikandan (Split up)
-
4.Perumal
-
5.Nadarajan
-
6.Murugan
-
7.Manikandan (Split up)
-
8.Veerasangali
-
9.Muthaiya (Split up)
-
10.Kannan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Tiruppur Principal Sessions Court acquitted all six defendants in a 2010 rioting case (Cr.No.2404/2010), finding the prosecution failed to prove charges under IPC sections 147, 148, and 307 beyond reasonable doubt. The court concluded the primary eyewitness (PW1) was unreliable and the victim did not testify, while investigative evidence lacked corroboration from medical professionals or scene-of-crime witnesses, rendering the prosecution case insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Questioning
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
04-Mar-2026
Service Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Service Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Service Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
06-Jan-2026
Service Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
Service Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
Service Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
Service Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
16-Oct-2025
Service Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
10-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
21-Aug-2025
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
01-Aug-2025
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
03-Jul-2025
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
19-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
06-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
29-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
02-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
25-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
05-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
20-Jan-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
02-Dec-2024
For further Proceedings
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
18-Nov-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
28-Oct-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
03-Oct-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
18-Sep-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
04-Sep-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
07-Aug-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
05-Aug-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
10-Jul-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
13-Jun-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
12-Apr-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
07-Mar-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
23-Feb-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
24-Jan-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
05-Jan-2024
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
02-Jan-2024
Service Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
14-Dec-2023
Framing of Charges
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
23-Nov-2023
Framing of Charges
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
02-Nov-2023
Service Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
16-Oct-2023
Service Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
08-Sep-2023
Service Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
02-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Sep-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 246/2023
Summary The Tiruppur Principal Sessions Court acquitted all six defendants in a 2010 rioting case (Cr.No.2404/2010), finding the prosecution failed to prove charges under IPC sections 147, 148, and 307 beyond reasonable doubt. The court concluded the primary eyewitness (PW1) was unreliable and the victim did not testify, while investigative evidence lacked corroboration from medical professionals or scene-of-crime witnesses, rendering the prosecution case insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts