Inspector Of Police ,Central Police Station ,Tiruppur vs Muthu @ Muthukumar (Split up) — 246/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,307r/w,149. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNTI040016502023
Filing Number
637/2023
Filing Date
02-09-2023
Registration No
246/2023
Registration Date
02-09-2023
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
4-Principal Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
2404
Police Station
Tirupur Central Police Station
Year
2010
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector Of Police ,Central Police Station ,Tiruppur
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Muthu @ Muthukumar (Split up)
Durai
Manikandan (Split up)
Perumal
Nadarajan
Murugan
Manikandan (Split up)
Veerasangali
Muthaiya (Split up)
Kannan
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Principal Subordinate Judge
Disposed
Questioning
Service Pending
Service Pending
Service Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 04-03-2026 | Service Pending |
| 16-02-2026 | Service Pending |
| 10-02-2026 | Service Pending |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Tiruppur Principal Sessions Court acquitted all six defendants in a 2010 rioting case (Cr.No.2404/2010), finding the prosecution failed to prove charges under IPC sections 147, 148, and 307 beyond reasonable doubt. The court concluded the primary eyewitness (PW1) was unreliable and the victim did not testify, while investigative evidence lacked corroboration from medical professionals or scene-of-crime witnesses, rendering the prosecution case insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Tiruppur Principal Sessions Court acquitted all six defendants in a 2010 rioting case (Cr.No.2404/2010), finding the prosecution failed to prove charges under IPC sections 147, 148, and 307 beyond reasonable doubt. The court concluded the primary eyewitness (PW1) was unreliable and the victim did not testify, while investigative evidence lacked corroboration from medical professionals or scene-of-crime witnesses, rendering the prosecution case insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts