M/S. Sri Balaganapathi Cotton Mills Rep by Partner K.Anandan vs Shanmugam Prop.of Sri Priya Tex Advocate - Rangasami Krishnaveni — 111/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI040016032023
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
1005/2023
Filing Date
23-08-2023
Registration No
111/2023
Registration Date
12-09-2023
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
4-Principal Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S. Sri Balaganapathi Cotton Mills Rep by Partner K.Anandan
Adv. Sachinandakumar
Respondent(s)
Shanmugam Prop.of Sri Priya Tex Advocate - Rangasami Krishnaveni
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Principal Subordinate Judge
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 10-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 23-01-2026 | Part Heard |
| 08-12-2025 | Part Heard |
| 19-11-2025 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Civil OS No. 111/2023 before the Principal District Court, Tiruppur, the plaintiff's witness (K. Anandan, age 50) testified on March 5, 2026 under Rule 44 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness submitted eight documentary evidences including company invoices, account statements, bills, legal notices, and company registration certificates, which were marked as exhibits. The case was adjourned for cross-examination of the witness, with the court accepting the witness statement as correctly recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Civil OS No. 111/2023 before the Principal District Court, Tiruppur, the plaintiff's witness (K. Anandan, age 50) testified on March 5, 2026 under Rule 44 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness submitted eight documentary evidences including company invoices, account statements, bills, legal notices, and company registration certificates, which were marked as exhibits. The case was adjourned for cross-examination of the witness, with the court accepting the witness statement as correctly recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts