M/S. Sri Balaganapathi Cotton Mills Rep by Partner K.Anandan vs Shanmugam Prop.of Sri Priya Tex Advocate - Rangasami Krishnaveni — 111/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI040016032023
Filing Number
1005/2023
Filing Date
23-Aug-2023
Registration No
111/2023
Registration Date
12-Sep-2023
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
4-Principal Subordinate Judge
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. Sri Balaganapathi Cotton Mills Rep by Partner K.Anandan
Adv. Sachinandakumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shanmugam Prop.of Sri Priya Tex Advocate - Rangasami Krishnaveni
Case History
-
26-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
Summary: In Civil OS No. 111/2023 before the Principal District Court, Tiruppur, the plaintiff's witness (K. Anandan, age 50) testified on March 5, 2026 under Rule 44 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness submitted eight documentary evidences including company invoices, account statements, bills, legal notices, and company registration certificates, which were marked as exhibits. The case was adjourned for cross-examination of the witness, with the court accepting the witness statement as correctly recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
10-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
19-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
28-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
04-Sep-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
29-Jul-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
30-Jun-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
02-Jun-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
15-Apr-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
01-Apr-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
28-Feb-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
05-Feb-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
03-Jan-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
04-Dec-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
14-Nov-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
04-Nov-2024
For further Proceedings
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
18-Oct-2024
For further Proceedings
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
26-Sep-2024
For further Proceedings
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
20-Sep-2024
For further Proceedings
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
22-Aug-2024
Issues
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
25-Jul-2024
Issues
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
02-Jul-2024
Issues
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
26-Apr-2024
Written Statement
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
04-Mar-2024
Written Statement
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
03-Jan-2024
Written Statement
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
01-Nov-2023
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
12-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 111/2023
Summary: In Civil OS No. 111/2023 before the Principal District Court, Tiruppur, the plaintiff's witness (K. Anandan, age 50) testified on March 5, 2026 under Rule 44 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness submitted eight documentary evidences including company invoices, account statements, bills, legal notices, and company registration certificates, which were marked as exhibits. The case was adjourned for cross-examination of the witness, with the court accepting the witness statement as correctly recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts