Raguprakash vs Gnayaprakash — 614/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 40(1),27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI040015342022
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Number
1174/2022
Filing Date
01-11-2022
Registration No
614/2022
Registration Date
14-12-2022
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
5-Additional Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raguprakash
Adv. Jothimani P
Respondent(s)
Gnayaprakash
Selvakani
Prabhakaran
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional Subordinate Judge
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 26-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 18-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 16-02-2026 | Trial |
| 09-02-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The petition filed by the 3rd defendant to set aside the ex-parte order passed against him was allowed with cost by the Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruppur on 27.02.2025. The court found that while the defendant failed to explain the delay in appearance adequately, the substituted service by newspaper publication warranted giving him a fair opportunity to present his defense in the interest of justice. The 3rd defendant is required to pay Rs. 1,000 as cost to the plaintiff on or before 06.03.2025, failing which the petition stands dismissed; the case is called for 06.03.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The petition filed by the 3rd defendant to set aside the ex-parte order passed against him was allowed with cost by the Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruppur on 27.02.2025. The court found that while the defendant failed to explain the delay in appearance adequately, the substituted service by newspaper publication warranted giving him a fair opportunity to present his defense in the interest of justice. The 3rd defendant is required to pay Rs. 1,000 as cost to the plaintiff on or before 06.03.2025, failing which the petition stands dismissed; the case is called for 06.03.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts