N.Santhamani vs Arumugam — 497/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b),O-7, R-1. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.

Judgement Next hearing 25-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI040013822022

Filing Number

1084/2022

Filing Date

23-Sep-2022

Registration No

497/2022

Registration Date

26-Sep-2022

Court

Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur

Judge

4-Principal Subordinate Judge

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b),O-7, R-1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.N.Santhamani

    Adv. Selvaraj E

  2. 2.K.Sarojini

  3. 3.S.Palanisamy

  4. 4.S.Varatharaj

  5. 5.G.Poongodi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Arumugam

  2. 2.Suruthi

  3. 3.Saravanan

  4. 4.Gokilavani

  5. 5.Nagaraj

  6. 6.G.Amutha

  7. 7.Megavarshini

Case History

  1. 25-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  3. 13-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  4. 02-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  5. 06-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  6. 08-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  7. 14-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  8. 03-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  9. 15-Oct-2025

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

    Case Summary Case: OS No. 497/2022 | Date: 15.10.2025 | Court: Tiruppur (Tamil Nadu) Outcome: The court completed examination of PW-1 (Sarojini) and cross-examination by defendants' counsel on 15.10.2025. The witness testified regarding ownership of a Thava (water tank) site located at Mariamman Temple Street in the disputed property. The witness claimed the property belongs to her family and provided documents including photos and tax receipts. The court found inconsistencies in the witness's testimony regarding property possession, tax payment dates, and conflicting accounts about ancestral ownership claims. No final order/judgment was pronounced—the case appears to be in ongoing evidence stage with examination of witness statements recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 15-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  11. 17-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  12. 21-Aug-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  13. 23-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  14. 26-Jun-2025

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  15. 26-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  16. 17-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  17. 06-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  18. 13-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  19. 10-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  20. 22-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  21. 07-Nov-2024

    Amendment

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  22. 21-Oct-2024

    Amendment

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  23. 30-Sep-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  24. 06-Sep-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  25. 14-Aug-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  26. 22-Jul-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  27. 26-Jun-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  28. 30-Apr-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  29. 05-Apr-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  30. 12-Mar-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  31. 30-Jan-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  32. 12-Jan-2024

    Trial

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  33. 08-Jan-2024

    Trial

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  34. 21-Nov-2023

    Trial

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  35. 09-Oct-2023

    Issues

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  36. 18-Sep-2023

    Issues

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  37. 16-Aug-2023

    Issues

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  38. 21-Jul-2023

    Issues

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  39. 18-Jul-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  40. 26-Jun-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  41. 21-Jun-2023

    Issues

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  42. 06-Jun-2023

    Issues

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  43. 21-Apr-2023

    Issues

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  44. 20-Apr-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  45. 17-Apr-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  46. 05-Apr-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  47. 06-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  48. 21-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  49. 26-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  50. 23-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 497/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: OS No. 497/2022 | Date: 15.10.2025 | Court: Tiruppur (Tamil Nadu) Outcome: The court completed examination of PW-1 (Sarojini) and cross-examination by defendants' counsel on 15.10.2025. The witness testified regarding ownership of a Thava (water tank) site located at Mariamman Temple Street in the disputed property. The witness claimed the property belongs to her family and provided documents including photos and tax receipts. The court found inconsistencies in the witness's testimony regarding property possession, tax payment dates, and conflicting accounts about ancestral ownership claims. No final order/judgment was pronounced—the case appears to be in ongoing evidence stage with examination of witness statements recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case