J.Yasothameenakshi vs S.Muthukumar Advocate - Bakthapiragalathan A — 92/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22,o-7, r-1. Status: Counter. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI040012842023
Filing Number
810/2023
Filing Date
10-Jul-2023
Registration No
92/2023
Registration Date
13-Jul-2023
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
4-Principal Subordinate Judge
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.J.Yasothameenakshi
Adv. Manavalan A
Respondent(s)
-
1.S.Muthukumar Advocate - Bakthapiragalathan A
Case History
-
28-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Mar-2026
Counter
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
SUMMARY: In this Commercial Suit (COS) No. 92/2023 dated 22.01.2026 from Tiruppur, the court recorded cross-examination testimony of the defendant's witness (DW-1 Muthu Kumar). The witness was questioned regarding discrepancies in rental agreement dates, claimed expenses of ₹5 lakhs for building improvements, electricity bills paid after vacating the property, and inconsistencies in the defendant's claims about money disbursed. The court found multiple contradictions in the witness's testimony regarding the actual rental agreement date (14.07.2021 vs 02.08.2021), failure to produce supporting documents like emails and bills, and the validity of claimed expenses. The case was adjourned for further proceedings with no final order passed on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
12-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
06-Aug-2025
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
06-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
18-Jul-2025
Appearance
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
26-Jun-2025
Appearance
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
24-Apr-2025
For further Proceedings
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
27-Mar-2025
For further Proceedings
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
20-Mar-2025
Arguments
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
24-Feb-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
13-Feb-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
28-Jan-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
06-Jan-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
12-Dec-2024
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
12-Dec-2024
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
29-Nov-2024
Appearance
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
20-Nov-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
07-Nov-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
22-Oct-2024
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
22-Oct-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
04-Oct-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
28-Aug-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
08-Aug-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
18-Jul-2024
Issues
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
28-Jun-2024
Issues
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
13-Jun-2024
Written Statement
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
04-Jun-2024
Written Statement
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
04-Apr-2024
Written Statement
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
10-Jan-2024
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
17-Nov-2023
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
06-Oct-2023
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
22-Aug-2023
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
13-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 92/2023
SUMMARY: In this Commercial Suit (COS) No. 92/2023 dated 22.01.2026 from Tiruppur, the court recorded cross-examination testimony of the defendant's witness (DW-1 Muthu Kumar). The witness was questioned regarding discrepancies in rental agreement dates, claimed expenses of ₹5 lakhs for building improvements, electricity bills paid after vacating the property, and inconsistencies in the defendant's claims about money disbursed. The court found multiple contradictions in the witness's testimony regarding the actual rental agreement date (14.07.2021 vs 02.08.2021), failure to produce supporting documents like emails and bills, and the validity of claimed expenses. The case was adjourned for further proceedings with no final order passed on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts