J.Yasothameenakshi vs S.Muthukumar Advocate - Bakthapiragalathan A — 92/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22,o-7, r-1. Status: Counter. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI040012842023
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
Filing Number
810/2023
Filing Date
10-07-2023
Registration No
92/2023
Registration Date
13-07-2023
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
4-Principal Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
J.Yasothameenakshi
Adv. Manavalan A
Respondent(s)
S.Muthukumar Advocate - Bakthapiragalathan A
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Principal Subordinate Judge
Counter
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Counter |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: In this Commercial Suit (COS) No. 92/2023 dated 22.01.2026 from Tiruppur, the court recorded cross-examination testimony of the defendant's witness (DW-1 Muthu Kumar). The witness was questioned regarding discrepancies in rental agreement dates, claimed expenses of ₹5 lakhs for building improvements, electricity bills paid after vacating the property, and inconsistencies in the defendant's claims about money disbursed. The court found multiple contradictions in the witness's testimony regarding the actual rental agreement date (14.07.2021 vs 02.08.2021), failure to produce supporting documents like emails and bills, and the validity of claimed expenses. The case was adjourned for further proceedings with no final order passed on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: In this Commercial Suit (COS) No. 92/2023 dated 22.01.2026 from Tiruppur, the court recorded cross-examination testimony of the defendant's witness (DW-1 Muthu Kumar). The witness was questioned regarding discrepancies in rental agreement dates, claimed expenses of ₹5 lakhs for building improvements, electricity bills paid after vacating the property, and inconsistencies in the defendant's claims about money disbursed. The court found multiple contradictions in the witness's testimony regarding the actual rental agreement date (14.07.2021 vs 02.08.2021), failure to produce supporting documents like emails and bills, and the validity of claimed expenses. The case was adjourned for further proceedings with no final order passed on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts