Arokkiya Amirtharaj vs Shanmugam — 440/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 22. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI040012762024
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1096/2024
Filing Date
07-12-2024
Registration No
440/2024
Registration Date
17-12-2024
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
5-Additional Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arokkiya Amirtharaj
Adv. Kannan S
Respondent(s)
Shanmugam
Priyanga
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional Subordinate Judge
Arguments
Evidence
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 16-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 09-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Copy of Deposition / Witness
This document is a court proceeding transcript from the Additional Civil Court, Tiruppur (OS No. 440/2024, dated 08.04.2026) recording witness examination. Witness P.W.-3 (Prakash) testified regarding a loan transaction involving Rs. 4 lakhs given on 10.08.2023, with disputes about whether the loan was actually disbursed and contradictory statements about the date and location of the transaction. The witness's testimony was recorded, cross-examined by the defendant's side, and the transcript was read back to and signed by the witness, confirming its accuracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a court proceeding transcript from the Additional Civil Court, Tiruppur (OS No. 440/2024, dated 08.04.2026) recording witness examination. Witness P.W.-3 (Prakash) testified regarding a loan transaction involving Rs. 4 lakhs given on 10.08.2023, with disputes about whether the loan was actually disbursed and contradictory statements about the date and location of the transaction. The witness's testimony was recorded, cross-examined by the defendant's side, and the transcript was read back to and signed by the witness, confirming its accuracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts