Magesh Babu vs Sathyaraj — 329/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI040010232024
Filing Number
825/2024
Filing Date
21-Sep-2024
Registration No
329/2024
Registration Date
16-Oct-2024
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
4-Principal Subordinate Judge
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Magesh Babu
Adv. Mohamed Khan M
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sathyaraj
-
2.S.Lega
Case History
-
04-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
Summary In OS No. 329/2024 dated 09.03.2026, the court recorded the cross-examination of the plaintiff's witness (Mahesh) regarding a financial dispute involving alleged loans and property transactions. The witness's testimony was recorded under oath, and upon completion, the court noted that no further cross-examination was required. The witness affirmed the accuracy of the recorded statement and signed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
03-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
10-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
24-Sep-2025
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
28-Aug-2025
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
18-Jul-2025
Issues
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
16-Jun-2025
Written Statement
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
07-Apr-2025
Written Statement
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
28-Jan-2025
Written Statement
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
27-Nov-2024
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
16-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 329/2024
Summary In OS No. 329/2024 dated 09.03.2026, the court recorded the cross-examination of the plaintiff's witness (Mahesh) regarding a financial dispute involving alleged loans and property transactions. The witness's testimony was recorded under oath, and upon completion, the court noted that no further cross-examination was required. The witness affirmed the accuracy of the recorded statement and signed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts