S. Chandrasekar vs R. Seleena — 294/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI040009832024
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
Filing Number
785/2024
Filing Date
06-09-2024
Registration No
294/2024
Registration Date
13-09-2024
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
5-Additional Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S. Chandrasekar
Adv. Nandhini S
Respondent(s)
R. Seleena
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional Subordinate Judge
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 26-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 19-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 12-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 05-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by plaintiff S. Chandrasekar to implead Mrs. Preethi as a necessary party to the suit was allowed on 4th December 2025. The court held that Mrs. Preethi, who purchased the suit property from the defendant on 13.11.2024 during the pendency of the original suit for money recovery, is a "lispendence purchaser" whose interests would be affected by the court's judgment, making her a necessary party to ensure complete adjudication and avoid multiplicity of proceedings. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by plaintiff S. Chandrasekar to implead Mrs. Preethi as a necessary party to the suit was allowed on 4th December 2025. The court held that Mrs. Preethi, who purchased the suit property from the defendant on 13.11.2024 during the pendency of the original suit for money recovery, is a "lispendence purchaser" whose interests would be affected by the court's judgment, making her a necessary party to ensure complete adjudication and avoid multiplicity of proceedings. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts