Wins Navarathna Agencies Rep by its Partner K. Subramaniam vs Jai Hind Rotary Printing Rep by its Partners — 310/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 22. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI040009232024
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
723/2024
Filing Date
27-08-2024
Registration No
310/2024
Registration Date
24-09-2024
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
5-Additional Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Wins Navarathna Agencies Rep by its Partner K. Subramaniam
Adv. Muralimohan S
Respondent(s)
Jai Hind Rotary Printing Rep by its Partners
Kanagaraj
Asha
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional Subordinate Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 02-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: In OS.No. 310/2024 before the Additional Civil Court, Tiruppur, dated 02.02.2026, witness P.W-1 (Subramaniam) was recalled for cross-examination by the defendant. The witness testified regarding partnership registration, invoice details for chemical sales worth Rs. 66,675, and various documentary submissions, with several claims of lack of knowledge regarding key transactions and registrations. The court recorded the witness statement, which was transcribed, read over, and the witness affixed his signature confirming its accuracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In OS.No. 310/2024 before the Additional Civil Court, Tiruppur, dated 02.02.2026, witness P.W-1 (Subramaniam) was recalled for cross-examination by the defendant. The witness testified regarding partnership registration, invoice details for chemical sales worth Rs. 66,675, and various documentary submissions, with several claims of lack of knowledge regarding key transactions and registrations. The court recorded the witness statement, which was transcribed, read over, and the witness affixed his signature confirming its accuracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts