A.Arunachalam vs The District Collector, Tiruppur Advocate - Arikaran R — 168/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b),o-7, r-1. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI040008502023

Trial

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

516/2023

Filing Date

21-04-2023

Registration No

168/2023

Registration Date

24-04-2023

Court

Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur

Judge

5-Additional Subordinate Judge

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b),o-7, r-1
Ia/6/2025 Classification : Others Section The District Collector, TiruppurA.Arunachalam

Petitioner(s)

A.Arunachalam

Adv. Parthiban M

Respondent(s)

The District Collector, Tiruppur Advocate - Arikaran R

Revenue Inspector, Tiruppur

Adv. Harikaran R

The Tahsildar, South Taluk

Adv. Harikaran R

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Additional Subordinate Judge

07-04-2026

Trial

09-03-2026

Trial

02-02-2026

Trial

22-01-2026

Additional Written Statement

08-01-2026

Additional Written Statement

Interim Orders

03-09-2024
Copy of Judgment

Court Order Summary Court: Additional Sub-Judge Court, Tiruppur Case: I.A. No. 5/2024 in O.S. No. 168/2023 Date: 03.09.2024 Outcome: The petition filed by the proposed party (third person) seeking to be impleaded as a necessary party in the original suit has been dismissed. The court held that the petitioner lacks the required standing to intervene in the dispute between the plaintiff and defendants regarding a disputed property, and therefore the petition is rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Court: Additional Sub-Judge Court, Tiruppur Case: I.A. No. 5/2024 in O.S. No. 168/2023 Date: 03.09.2024 Outcome: The petition filed by the proposed party (third person) seeking to be impleaded as a necessary party in the original suit has been dismissed. The court held that the petitioner lacks the required standing to intervene in the dispute between the plaintiff and defendants regarding a disputed property, and therefore the petition is rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case