New Allwin Dyers Rep by its Prop.Ponnusamy vs SMV. Tex Rep by its Partners Sonai Murugan and Sonai Velayee — 230/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI040008052024
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Number
595/2024
Filing Date
18-07-2024
Registration No
230/2024
Registration Date
31-07-2024
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
5-Additional Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
New Allwin Dyers Rep by its Prop.Ponnusamy
Adv. Nagarajan M
Respondent(s)
SMV. Tex Rep by its Partners Sonai Murugan and Sonai Velayee
Ayyanan sonai ,partner SMV Tex
Sonai Velayee Patner of SMV TEX
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional Subordinate Judge
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 26-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 19-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 12-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 05-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
OUTCOME SUMMARY: The petition for property attachment before judgment has been dismissed. The court found that the defendants' property was already mortgaged to Ujjivan Small Finance Bank (since January 2021), making alienation impossible. Additionally, the plaintiff failed to prove the defendants were attempting to sell the property or provide concrete evidence of such attempts, and therefore did not satisfy the stringent requirements under CPC Order XXXVIII Rule 5. No costs imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
OUTCOME SUMMARY: The petition for property attachment before judgment has been dismissed. The court found that the defendants' property was already mortgaged to Ujjivan Small Finance Bank (since January 2021), making alienation impossible. Additionally, the plaintiff failed to prove the defendants were attempting to sell the property or provide concrete evidence of such attempts, and therefore did not satisfy the stringent requirements under CPC Order XXXVIII Rule 5. No costs imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts