Inspector of police Nallur Police Station Tiruppur vs Selvam — 84/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),341,323,307,506(2),109,324,326,34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNTI040007232024

Filing Number

243/2024

Filing Date

28-May-2024

Registration No

84/2024

Registration Date

28-May-2024

Court

Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur

Judge

4-Principal Subordinate Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

732

Police Station

Tiruppur Rural

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),341,323,307,506(2),109,324,326,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police Nallur Police Station Tiruppur

    Adv. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Selvam

  2. 2.Andiselvam

  3. 3.Suthanthirarajan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Court in Tiruppur acquitted all three accused under IPC Sections 294(b), 326, and 307, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the main witness (the alleged victim) did not provide testimony supporting the assault case, critical medical witnesses were not examined, and the investigative evidence was insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    Service Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  10. 22-Jan-2026

    Service Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  11. 17-Dec-2025

    Service Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  12. 04-Dec-2025

    Service Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  13. 18-Nov-2025

    Service Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  14. 04-Nov-2025

    Service Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  15. 15-Oct-2025

    Service Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  16. 24-Sep-2025

    Service Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  17. 03-Sep-2025

    Service Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  18. 13-Aug-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  19. 23-Jul-2025

    Service Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  20. 30-Jun-2025

    Service Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  21. 04-Jun-2025

    Service Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  22. 22-Apr-2025

    Service Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  23. 24-Mar-2025

    Service Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  24. 26-Feb-2025

    Service Pending

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  25. 01-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  26. 06-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  27. 25-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  28. 22-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  29. 14-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  30. 06-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  31. 12-Aug-2024

    Appearance

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  32. 22-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  33. 25-Jun-2024

    Appearance

    Principal Subordinate Judge

  34. 18-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 28-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 84/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Court in Tiruppur acquitted all three accused under IPC Sections 294(b), 326, and 307, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the main witness (the alleged victim) did not provide testimony supporting the assault case, critical medical witnesses were not examined, and the investigative evidence was insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case