G Jayaram vs Pappammal — 270/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 7 RULE 1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI040006902025
e-Filing Number
12-08-2025
Filing Number
766/2025
Filing Date
14-Aug-2025
Registration No
270/2025
Registration Date
26-Aug-2025
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
5-Additional Subordinate Judge
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.G Jayaram
Adv. S Elango
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pappammal
Case History
-
27-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Apr-2026
Arguments
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Arguments
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Arguments
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
In O.S. No. 270/2025 before the Additional Subordinate Court, Tiruppur, the witness (plaintiff's representative) testified on March 9, 2026 and submitted an affidavit with supporting documents including a registered mortgage deed, property sale deed, and legal notice correspondence. The court accepted the witness testimony and admitted all documentary evidence filed by the plaintiff's side into the record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Written Statement
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
24-Nov-2025
Written Statement
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
25-Oct-2025
Issue of Service
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
26-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 270/2025
In O.S. No. 270/2025 before the Additional Subordinate Court, Tiruppur, the witness (plaintiff's representative) testified on March 9, 2026 and submitted an affidavit with supporting documents including a registered mortgage deed, property sale deed, and legal notice correspondence. The court accepted the witness testimony and admitted all documentary evidence filed by the plaintiff's side into the record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts