VEERAMANI vs Senthilkumar — 238/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER VII RULE 1. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI040006292025
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
e-Filing Number
21-07-2025
Filing Number
697/2025
Filing Date
23-07-2025
Registration No
238/2025
Registration Date
31-07-2025
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
5-Additional Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VEERAMANI
Adv. Kumaran S
Respondent(s)
Senthilkumar
S.Vasantha
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional Subordinate Judge
Judgement
Arguments
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 23-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-02-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 07-02-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 17-12-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary In O.S.No.238/2025 before the Additional District Court, Tiruppur, the plaintiff's witness (PW-1) Veeramani, age 62, deposed on February 7, 2026 under Rule 44 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness affirmed his affidavit testimony as truthful, produced documentary evidence including acknowledgment slips, bank receipts, and lawyer's notices with postal receipts (marked as exhibits 1-5), and requested the court to accept his evidence. The cross-examination was waived, and the witness testified accurately; the court accepted and recorded the witness statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In O.S.No.238/2025 before the Additional District Court, Tiruppur, the plaintiff's witness (PW-1) Veeramani, age 62, deposed on February 7, 2026 under Rule 44 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness affirmed his affidavit testimony as truthful, produced documentary evidence including acknowledgment slips, bank receipts, and lawyer's notices with postal receipts (marked as exhibits 1-5), and requested the court to accept his evidence. The cross-examination was waived, and the witness testified accurately; the court accepted and recorded the witness statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts