Bhakiyalakshmi vs R. Velumani — 151/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(a). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI040005982024

Part Heard

Next Hearing

21st April 2026

Filing Number

395/2024

Filing Date

22-04-2024

Registration No

151/2024

Registration Date

22-04-2024

Court

Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur

Judge

4-Principal Subordinate Judge

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(a)
Ia/3/2026 Classification : Petition to Set Aside Exparte Section R. VelumaniBhakiyalakshmi
Ia/4/2026 Classification : Reopen Petition Section R. VelumaniBhakiyalakshmi
Ia/5/2026 Classification : Recall Petition Section R. VelumaniBhakiyalakshmi

Petitioner(s)

Bhakiyalakshmi

Adv. Sachinandakumar

Shanmugam

Meenachi

Selvi

Respondent(s)

R. Velumani

Amutha

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Principal Subordinate Judge

26-03-2026

Part Heard

09-03-2026

Part Heard

13-02-2026

Part Heard

09-02-2026

Part Heard

02-02-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

13-02-2026
Copy of Deposition / Witness

Case Summary Case: OS No.151/2024 | Date: 13.02.2026 | Court: Tiruppur Outcome: Case adjourned for cross-examination to continue. Witness PW-1 (Meenakshi) was recalled and examined-in-chief by the plaintiff's counsel on 13.02.2026, followed by cross-examination by the defendant's counsel. The witness's statement was recorded in the judge's presence and identified by the witness. No further cross-examination was required. The case involves a property dispute concerning house number identification (Door No. 9 vs. Door No. 7) and inheritance-related issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: OS No.151/2024 | Date: 13.02.2026 | Court: Tiruppur Outcome: Case adjourned for cross-examination to continue. Witness PW-1 (Meenakshi) was recalled and examined-in-chief by the plaintiff's counsel on 13.02.2026, followed by cross-examination by the defendant's counsel. The witness's statement was recorded in the judge's presence and identified by the witness. No further cross-examination was required. The case involves a property dispute concerning house number identification (Door No. 9 vs. Door No. 7) and inheritance-related issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case