Gavutham Bharathi vs Dharmaraj — 240/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order 7 rule 1. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI040005782025
e-Filing Number
01-07-2025
Filing Number
643/2025
Filing Date
04-Jul-2025
Registration No
240/2025
Registration Date
04-Aug-2025
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
5-Additional Subordinate Judge
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Gavutham Bharathi
Adv. PRASHANTH M
-
2.Anuradha
Adv. PRASHANTH M
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dharmaraj
-
2.Saranraj
Case History
-
06-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
In O.S. No. 240/2025 before the Additional Subordinate Court, Tiruppur, the witness (plaintiff) S. Bharathi, aged 35, testified under oath and submitted affidavit evidence with supporting bank documents and records. The court admitted the plaintiff's documentary evidence into the record, and the witness's testimony was recorded, read over, and affirmed by the witness as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
Written Statement
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
05-Nov-2025
Written Statement
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Issue of Service
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
04-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 240/2025
In O.S. No. 240/2025 before the Additional Subordinate Court, Tiruppur, the witness (plaintiff) S. Bharathi, aged 35, testified under oath and submitted affidavit evidence with supporting bank documents and records. The court admitted the plaintiff's documentary evidence into the record, and the witness's testimony was recorded, read over, and affirmed by the witness as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts