P Sundar vs R Ranganayaki — 228/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order VII Rule 1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI040005622025
e-Filing Number
21-06-2025
Filing Number
625/2025
Filing Date
01-Jul-2025
Registration No
228/2025
Registration Date
18-Jul-2025
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
5-Additional Subordinate Judge
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P Sundar
Adv. S Elango
Respondent(s)
-
1.R Ranganayaki
Case History
-
27-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Apr-2026
Arguments
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Arguments
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Arguments
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
Summary: In O.S. No. 228/2025 before the Additional Sub-Court, Tiruppur, the court recorded the affidavit evidence of the plaintiff (P.W.-1), Mr. Sundhar, on March 9, 2026, under Rule 44 of the 1969 Code. The court admitted all documentary evidence produced by the plaintiff's side, including various agreements, property deeds, and lawyer notices dated between 2003-2024, which were marked and filed. No cross-examination was conducted, and the witness affirmed the accuracy of his testimony before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
03-Jan-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Written Statement
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
17-Oct-2025
Written Statement
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
18-Sep-2025
Written Statement
Additional Subordinate Judge
-
18-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 228/2025
Summary: In O.S. No. 228/2025 before the Additional Sub-Court, Tiruppur, the court recorded the affidavit evidence of the plaintiff (P.W.-1), Mr. Sundhar, on March 9, 2026, under Rule 44 of the 1969 Code. The court admitted all documentary evidence produced by the plaintiff's side, including various agreements, property deeds, and lawyer notices dated between 2003-2024, which were marked and filed. No cross-examination was conducted, and the witness affirmed the accuracy of his testimony before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts