R. Venkatachalapathy vs S. Balakrishnan — 221/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d),27(C). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI040005572025
Filing Number
620/2025
Filing Date
30-Jun-2025
Registration No
221/2025
Registration Date
11-Jul-2025
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
4-Principal Subordinate Judge
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.R. Venkatachalapathy
Adv. Ramakrishnan .D
Respondent(s)
-
1.S. Balakrishnan
-
2.C.Seenivasan
-
3.The Sub-Registrar, Nallur
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
Summary: The Principal District Court, Tiruppur, heard plaintiff witness testimony on March 23, 2026, under CPC Rule 44 (1969). The witness (Venkatachalapathi) produced seven documentary exhibits including land deeds dated from 1995-2025 and an encumbrance certificate, which were marked as evidence. The court adjourned the case for continuation of cross-examination and further filing of documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Issues
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Written Statement
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Written Statement
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
27-Nov-2025
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
17-Oct-2025
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
09-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 221/2025
Summary: The Principal District Court, Tiruppur, heard plaintiff witness testimony on March 23, 2026, under CPC Rule 44 (1969). The witness (Venkatachalapathi) produced seven documentary exhibits including land deeds dated from 1995-2025 and an encumbrance certificate, which were marked as evidence. The court adjourned the case for continuation of cross-examination and further filing of documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts