The Inspector Of Police, Tiruppur Central Police Station,Tiruppur vs Muthu @ Muthukumar — 61/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,304 r/w,149. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNTI040005492024
Filing Number
193/2024
Filing Date
01-Apr-2024
Registration No
61/2024
Registration Date
01-Apr-2024
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
4-Principal Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
23
Police Station
Tirupur Central Police Station
Year
2012
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The Inspector Of Police, Tiruppur Central Police Station,Tiruppur
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Muthu @ Muthukumar
-
2.Manikandan
-
3.Manikandan (died)
-
4.Muthaiya
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Tiruppur High Court acquitted all accused in two consolidated criminal cases (SC Nos. 246/2023 and 61/2024) for an assault incident from November 2010. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the primary eyewitness (PW.1) could not reliably identify the accused or provide substantive evidence of their involvement in the alleged attack. Consequently, all accused were acquitted under IPC Sections 147, 148, 307, and 149, applying the principle of giving the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Questioning
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
04-Mar-2026
Service Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Service Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Service Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
10-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
01-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
03-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
19-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
06-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
29-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
02-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
25-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
05-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
20-Jan-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
02-Dec-2024
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
18-Nov-2024
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
28-Oct-2024
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
03-Oct-2024
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
18-Sep-2024
Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
06-Sep-2024
For further Proceedings
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
04-Sep-2024
For further Proceedings
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
28-Aug-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
21-Aug-2024
Service Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
07-Aug-2024
Service Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
24-Jul-2024
Service Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
10-Jul-2024
Appearance
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
01-Jul-2024
Appearance
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
20-Jun-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
13-Jun-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
06-Jun-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
13-May-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
30-Apr-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
22-Apr-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
08-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 61/2024
Summary The Tiruppur High Court acquitted all accused in two consolidated criminal cases (SC Nos. 246/2023 and 61/2024) for an assault incident from November 2010. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the primary eyewitness (PW.1) could not reliably identify the accused or provide substantive evidence of their involvement in the alleged attack. Consequently, all accused were acquitted under IPC Sections 147, 148, 307, and 149, applying the principle of giving the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts