R.Mohanasundaram vs S.Latha — 113/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22,o-7, r-1. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI040005382023
Filing Number
343/2023
Filing Date
06-Mar-2023
Registration No
113/2023
Registration Date
10-Mar-2023
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
4-Principal Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.R.Mohanasundaram
Adv. Sundararajan M
Respondent(s)
-
1.S.Latha
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
15-Apr-2026
Arguments
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
Summary In OS No. 113/2023 (Tiruppur), the court examined the cross-examination testimony of defendant witness DW-1 (Latha) recorded on 05.02.2026. The witness acknowledged receiving a notice and provided contradictory statements regarding document authenticity, admission of notice receipt, and the reasons for filing a precautionary petition. The court found the witness's testimony credible and admissible, noting her employment since 2008 and residential stability, while recording her statement as delivered under oath in judicial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
03-Sep-2025
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
11-Aug-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
22-Jul-2025
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
22-Jul-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
08-Jul-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
18-Jun-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
25-Apr-2025
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
25-Apr-2025
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
25-Apr-2025
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
26-Feb-2025
Appearance
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
08-Jan-2025
Appearance
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
06-Dec-2024
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
22-Nov-2024
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
12-Nov-2024
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
04-Nov-2024
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
16-Oct-2024
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
09-Sep-2024
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
09-Sep-2024
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
12-Aug-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
12-Jul-2024
Trial
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
18-Jun-2024
Issues
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
19-Apr-2024
Issues
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
19-Mar-2024
Issues
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
23-Feb-2024
Issues
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
08-Feb-2024
Issues
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
09-Jan-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
20-Nov-2023
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
27-Oct-2023
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
08-Sep-2023
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
11-Jul-2023
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
18-Apr-2023
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
10-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 113/2023
Summary In OS No. 113/2023 (Tiruppur), the court examined the cross-examination testimony of defendant witness DW-1 (Latha) recorded on 05.02.2026. The witness acknowledged receiving a notice and provided contradictory statements regarding document authenticity, admission of notice receipt, and the reasons for filing a precautionary petition. The court found the witness's testimony credible and admissible, noting her employment since 2008 and residential stability, while recording her statement as delivered under oath in judicial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts