Nandhini vs The Manager UGRO Capital Limited — 36/2025
Case under Provincial Insolvency Act,1920 Section 10 & 13. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 09th March 2026.
IP - Insolvency Petition
CNR: TNTI040002942025
e-Filing Number
21-03-2025
Filing Number
323/2025
Filing Date
27-Mar-2025
Registration No
36/2025
Registration Date
16-Apr-2025
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
4-Principal Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nandhini
Adv. V ANANDAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Manager UGRO Capital Limited
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of DecreeView PDF
The Tiruppur Principal Subordinate Judge dismissed petitioner Nandhini's insolvency petition (filed under the Provincial Insolvency Act 1920) for lack of proof of a specific act of insolvency as required by law. Although the petitioner had liabilities of Rs. 5,72,062 against minimal assets of Rs. 1,000, the court found insufficient evidence of the statutory act of insolvency needed to adjudge her insolvent. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Orders
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Enquiry
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
03-Dec-2025
Enquiry
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
04-Nov-2025
Enquiry
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Enquiry
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
04-Sep-2025
Enquiry
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
01-Aug-2025
Enquiry
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
01-Jul-2025
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
16-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 36/2025
The Tiruppur Principal Subordinate Judge dismissed petitioner Nandhini's insolvency petition (filed under the Provincial Insolvency Act 1920) for lack of proof of a specific act of insolvency as required by law. Although the petitioner had liabilities of Rs. 5,72,062 against minimal assets of Rs. 1,000, the court found insufficient evidence of the statutory act of insolvency needed to adjudge her insolvent. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts