Union Bank of India(e-Andhra Bank), Rep by its Manger Anupparpalayam Branch, Anupparpalayam. vs J. Dharani — 109/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 05th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI040002912025
Filing Number
321/2025
Filing Date
26-Mar-2025
Registration No
109/2025
Registration Date
28-Mar-2025
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
4-Principal Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
05-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Union Bank of India(e-Andhra Bank), Rep by its Manger Anupparpalayam Branch, Anupparpalayam.
Adv. Kirubagar M
Respondent(s)
-
1.J. Dharani
-
2.A.Jayaprakash
-
3.J.Hemalatha
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruppur dismissed Union Bank of India's money recovery suit against three defendants for Rs. 1,02,170 with 12% annual compound interest due to the plaintiff's absence at the final hearing on 05.03.2026. The court invoked the default dismissal provision, finding that despite the matter pending for the plaintiff's appearance in an interim application, the plaintiff failed to appear in court, warranting dismissal in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Appearance
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
Appearance
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Appearance
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Appearance
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Appearance
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
05-Aug-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
29-Apr-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal Subordinate Judge
-
28-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 109/2025
The Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruppur dismissed Union Bank of India's money recovery suit against three defendants for Rs. 1,02,170 with 12% annual compound interest due to the plaintiff's absence at the final hearing on 05.03.2026. The court invoked the default dismissal provision, finding that despite the matter pending for the plaintiff's appearance in an interim application, the plaintiff failed to appear in court, warranting dismissal in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts