M/S. Sri Vari Finance Rep by K.Jegatheesan vs M.Sakthi Advocate - Merlin D — 70/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22,O-7, R-1. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI040002332023
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
147/2023
Filing Date
30-01-2023
Registration No
70/2023
Registration Date
15-02-2023
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
5-Additional Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S. Sri Vari Finance Rep by K.Jegatheesan
Adv. Basumani
Respondent(s)
M.Sakthi Advocate - Merlin D
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional Subordinate Judge
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 23-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 07-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 12-01-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 16-12-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary In O.S. No. 70/2023 before the Additional Sub-Court, Tiruppur, the court recorded the affidavit testimony of witness P.W.-2 (Mr. Muhammad Yusuf, age 70) on February 1, 2025. The witness's sworn statement was read and confirmed as accurate; no cross-examination was conducted and no documents were marked. The court accepted the witness's testimony as truthful and properly recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In O.S. No. 70/2023 before the Additional Sub-Court, Tiruppur, the court recorded the affidavit testimony of witness P.W.-2 (Mr. Muhammad Yusuf, age 70) on February 1, 2025. The witness's sworn statement was read and confirmed as accurate; no cross-examination was conducted and no documents were marked. The court accepted the witness's testimony as truthful and properly recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts