R. Rathinasamy Proprietor of M/s Prince Dyeing vs R. Saraswathi Advocate - Chinnasamy A C — 98/2021
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 25(d),27(c). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI040001382021
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
Filing Number
173/2021
Filing Date
18-03-2021
Registration No
98/2021
Registration Date
18-03-2021
Court
Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur
Judge
5-Additional Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R. Rathinasamy Proprietor of M/s Prince Dyeing
Adv. Sathishkumar M
Respondent(s)
R. Saraswathi Advocate - Chinnasamy A C
G. Jayanthi
G. Udhayakumar
Navaneethan
Sumathi
Adv. Chinnasamy A C
Rajeshwari
S. Dhayanithi
Adv. Chinnasamy A C
M/s Tiruppur Murugampalayam Common Effluents Treatment Company Limited, Represented by its Chairman,
Adv. Ramamurthy S
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional Subordinate Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC by defendants 2-4 to recall PW.1 for cross-examination was allowed by the Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruppur on 31.07.2024. The court found that since the petitioners were set ex-parte in August 2021 but only learned of it in December 2023, and their petitions to set aside the ex-parte orders were subsequently allowed, they must be permitted to cross-examine the plaintiff's witnesses to defend their case. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC by defendants 2-4 to recall PW.1 for cross-examination was allowed by the Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruppur on 31.07.2024. The court found that since the petitioners were set ex-parte in August 2021 but only learned of it in December 2023, and their petitions to set aside the ex-parte orders were subsequently allowed, they must be permitted to cross-examine the plaintiff's witnesses to defend their case. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts