Dhanabal vs Chandrasekaran — 812/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 37(2),25(d),27(C). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 10th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI030009032024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
536/2024
Filing Date
08-08-2024
Registration No
812/2024
Registration Date
24-10-2024
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court, Dharapuram
Judge
1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dhanabal
Adv. Chitra Ponds S
Respondent(s)
Chandrasekaran
Ashokan
Nallammal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Ex-Parte Evidence
For further Proceedings
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence | |
| 26-02-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 04-02-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence | |
| 29-01-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed plaintiff Dhanabal's suit for partition, separate possession, declaration, and permanent injunction against defendants Chandrasekaran, Ashokan, and Nallammal for default. The plaintiff failed to appear at the final hearing without representation, and despite being granted sufficient opportunities, no ex parte evidence was recorded, resulting in dismissal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed plaintiff Dhanabal's suit for partition, separate possession, declaration, and permanent injunction against defendants Chandrasekaran, Ashokan, and Nallammal for default. The plaintiff failed to appear at the final hearing without representation, and despite being granted sufficient opportunities, no ex parte evidence was recorded, resulting in dismissal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts